Main Article Content

Authors

This article returns to the classic and complex concept of alienation and aims to contribute to its elaboration for today's social philosophy. The idea is to articulate the approaches to alienation developed by Rahel Jaeggi and Axel Honneth, based on a philosopher presumably alien to critical theory, namely Martin Heidegger, and to disassociate ourselves from these authors as we develop the concept. We propose to offer a structural analysis of the concept that will allow us to identify certain basic features that will later serve to elaborate a diagnosis of social pathologies in the contemporary world.

Fernando Forero Pineda, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia

Doctor of Philosophy from the Fern-Universität Hagen (Germany) and the Universidad Nacional de Colombia; He completed his doctorate within the framework of the Deutschlateinamerikanisches Forschungs- und Promotionsnetzwerk Philosophie. He has a master's degree in philosophy from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia and a degree in social sciences and sociologist. It is part of the Contemporary Hermeneutics Research Group (Universidad Nacional de Colombia). In his doctoral research he dealt with the evolution of Hegelian philosophy in the Jena period and particularly with the concept of negativity in that young professor. His fields of interest are the sources of Hegel's philosophy (Plato, Aristotle, Kant, romanticism and post-Kantian idealism) and the extensions of Hegelian philosophy both in the side of Marx and Marxism and in that of hermeneutical philosophy ( particularly in Heidegger and Gadamer). Another of his areas of interest is classical and contemporary social theory. He has carried out research on classical social theory (Marx, Durkheim and Weber), and on social and political thought at the Frankfurt School (Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse, Habermas, Honneth and the recent works of Hartmund Rosa, Reiner Forst and Rahel Jaeggi ).

Forero Pineda, F. (2021). What is Alienation? Perspectives for the Actualization of a Concept of Critical Social Thinking. Praxis Filosófica, (52), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i52.10713 (Original work published April 13, 2021)

Butler, J. (2015). Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Harvard University Press.

Christman, J. (2018). Decentered Social Selves Interrogating Alienation in Conversation with Rahel Jaeggi. En A. Allen, & E. Mendieta, Eduardo (Ed.), From Alienation to Forms of Life (pp. 33-42). The Critical Theory of Rahel Jaeggi. The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Cuchumbé, N. (2012). El aporte filosófico de Gadamer y Taylor a la democracia: actitud de diálogo abierto y reconocimiento recíproco. Praxis filosófica, (35), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i35.3481

Forero, F. (2017). Ontología del acontecer. El camino de Hans-Georg Gadamer. Ideas y Valores, 66 (164), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v66n164.55658

Forero, F. (2019). Filosofía y experiencia en Hegel: la Fenomenología del espíritu y la Enciclopedia de las ciencias filosóficas en diálogo. Universitas Philosophica, 37(75), 17-43. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uph37-75.fehf

Forero, F. (2020). Tiempo e historia. Contribución a una filosofía social crítica. Praxis Filosófica, (50), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i50.8792

Forst, R. (2014). Justificación y crítica. Perspectivas de una teoría crítica de la política. Katz.

Gadamer, H. G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen.

Gama, L. E. (2020). Amitié et solidarité. La politique de Hans-Georg Gadamer. Archives de Philosophie, 83(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.3917/aphi.832.0177

Hegel, G. W. F. (2016a). Frühe Schriften. Werke (I). Suhrkamp.

Hegel, G. W. F. (2016b). Phänomenologie des Geistes. Werke (III). Suhrkamp.

Hegel, G. W. F. (2016c). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Werke (VII). Suhrkamp.

Heidegger, M. (1976). Sein und Zeit. Niemeyer.

Honneth, A. (1994). Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Suhrkamp.

Honneth, A. (2005). Verdinglichung, Eine anerkennungstheoretische Studie. Suhrkamp.

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, Th. (2006). Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Fischer Verlag.

Jaeggi, R. (2016). Entfremdung. Zur Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Problems. Campus Verlag.

Jaeggi, R. (2014). Kritik von Lebensformen. Suhrkamp.

Kierkegaard, Th. S. (2000). Furcht und Zittern. GTBSiebenstern.

Lukács, G. (1968). Geschichte und Klassenbewusstsein. Luchterhand.

Marx, K. (1867). Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Oekonomie. Erster Band. Buch I. Der Produktionsprocess des Kapitals. Verlag Otto Meissner.

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1968). Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844. [Werke. Band 40]. Holzinger.

Neuhouser F. (2018). The Normativity of Forms of Life. En A. Allen, & E. Mendieta, Eduardo (Ed.), From Alienation to Forms of Life. The Critical Theory of Rahel Jaeggi (pp. 43-52). The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Parra, A. (2014). El disenso hermenéutico. Ideas y valores, 63(155), 59 – 84. https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v63n155.34217

Quante, M. (2011). Die Wirklichkeit des Geistes: Studien zu Hegel. Suhrkamp.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press.

Ribeiro, M. (2012). De Marx A Horkheimer: una historia de la convergencia entre la teoría y la práctica. Praxis filosófica, (34), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i34.3496

Rosa, H. (2016). Alienación y aceleración. Hacia una teoría crítica de la temporalidad en la modernidad tardía. Katz.

Schürmann, R. (2013). Le principe d’anarchie. Heidegger et la question de l’agir. Diaphanes.

Taylor, C. (2009). El multiculturalismo y la política del reconocimiento. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Received 2020-10-29
Accepted 2020-10-29
Published 2021-09-28